Sunday, September 18, 2011

Describe the tone differences between Hair and Theme for English B and how it contributes to the differing overall stance of each author in light of white status measured above black status

Although Hair and Theme for English B both revolve on the issue of racism, their attitudes towards it are extremely different. In Hair, Malcolm X shows an angry and violent tone towards the matter. Although in the beginning of his memoir, he seemed excited and anxious to go through the change to have a white person’s hair, looking back on it, he was ashamed and irate towards white superiority. A primary reason for his aggressive attitude would be how many black people have admitted to the fact that white people are superior. He came to this realization by looking back on his painful experience to make his hair look pretty by white standards. While in Theme for English B, Langston Hughes has a passive, playful, and non-aggressive tone. With this tone, Langston Hughes shows that his stance towards white status superiority is rather peaceful. Though he wants equality just like Malcolm X, he prefers the two races to accept differences and not be racist. Although he continues to state the huge differences between himself and his white professor, which he is supposedly writing to, he also shows what he likes to prove that he isn’t any different than any other person despite the color of his skin. Instead of having an attitude of rebellion like Malcolm X, Langston Hughes wants blacks and whites to reconcile with each other. Hughes concluded with another symbol of how blacks and whites are equal. He concludes with how that they are all American, which is supposed to be the emblem of unity between blacks and whites.

3 comments:

  1. I fully agree with everything you wrote here, as I understood the facts and comparisons you made. You have really nice facts about each of the author's attitudes towards the topic (racism) and how they acted towards it. I also like how you link the two authors in at different points within your summary, when trying to compare them both. Your summary is percise, and straight to the point for all the facts that you mention.
    I only disagree with one of the things you mention in this. I don't really think that Malcolm X's attitude towards the 'racism' problem is rebellious. I feel as though it's more regretful.
    Nice Summary!! :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Alex!
    After reading your weblog I found that many of the things you said, I said as well. I agree that Malcolm X did undergo a big change in the midst of his story. The change from that calm, playful attitude to a more aggressive and hostile form of writing. I agree that the reason Malcolm changed was because he realized that most black people were trying to look pretty or acceptable by white standards. I like how you said painful standards because I believe that the event he went through was physically painful but just as much emotionally painful due to the realization he had later on. I have to disagree on the point you said about how Langston was trying to accept the differences and not be racist. I still think Langston was trying to get across a point of that they are different and that white people tend to judge them differently but he did this is a more subdued way compared to Malcolm X's tone of voice. Great Weblog overall!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is an excellent piece of writing. Our thoughts and opinions have a lot in common. I agree that Malcolm X changes the tone as the story goes on. However, in the end, I think that Malcolm X's tone also becomes of full of regret, not just anger and violence. I agree with your opinion that Langston Hughes has a passive and non-aggressive tone. I also agree that he believed black people aren't any different from white people. I like your comparison of the two authors' tones in general. I like your use of words, too. Overall, this was in interesting one to read!

    ReplyDelete